|
 |
References
Cited works are the evidence-base for knowledge creation. The References pages provide a resource for new learning about innovation and collaboration and, allow for validation of current scholarship. Easy access to key literature is intended to support collaborative endeavors and seed scholarly papers and think again articles.
Studies
Adamic, L. A., & Adar, E. (2003). Friends and neighbors on the web. Social Networks, 25, 211-230.
Aharonson, B. S., Baum, J.A.C., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Industrial clustering and the returns to inventive activity: Canadian biotechnology firms, 1991-2000. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Working Paper No 04-03.
Asheim, B.T., Coenen, L. (2004). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34, 1173-1190.
Baker, A. (2000). Defense spending on declining path till 2010. National Defense, December).
Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 454-465.
Best, A., Stokols, D., Green, L. W., Leischow, S., Holmes, B., Buchholz, K. (2003). An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18, 168-76.
Bieber, M., Engelbart, D., Furuta, R., Hiltz, S. R., Noll, J., Preece, J., Stohr, E. A., Turoff, M., & Van de Walle, B. (2002). Towards virtual community knowledge evolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 11-35.
Campbell, D. J. (2005). University/business research networks: new challenges for knowledge production and advanced innovation systems. Bridges, 5, (8 June 2005).
Campbell, E. G., Koski, G., & Blumenthal, D. (2004). The triple helix: University, government and industry relationships in the life sciences. A commissioned report sponsored by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. Boston, MA: AEI-Brookings Joint Center on Regulatory Studies (Working Paper 04-12).
Campbell, E. G., Powers, J. B., Blumenthal, D. & Biles, B. (2004). Inside the triple helix: Technology transfer and commercialization in the life sciences. Health Affairs, 23, 64-76.
Chang, I., Galing, S., Wong, C., Yee, H., Axelband, E., Onesi, M., & Horn, K. (1999). Use of public-private partnerships to meet future army needs (RAND Monograph MR-997-A). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Cooke, P. (in press). Regional innovation systems, asymmetric knowledge and the legacies of learning. In R. Ruten, F. Boekema, & G. Hospers (Eds.), The learning region: Foundations, state of the art, future. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Cowan, R., & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 211-253.
Cox, E. (1998). Measuring social capital as part of progress and well being. In R. Eckersley (Ed.), Measuring progress: Is life getting better? pp. 157-168. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO.
Cox, E., & Caldwell, P. (2000). Making policy social. In I. Winter, Social capital and public policy in Australia (pp. 43-73). Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.
Dambrowitz, C. J., Champ, J., & Davidson, W. R. (2005). Opportunities lost and captured: Canadian case studies outlining socio-economic impact of the Triple Helix Innovation Model on Technology Development in genomics and proteomics. Spectrum, Genome Alberta, (7 June 2005).
De Bruijn, P.J.M. (2004). Spatial dimensions of cooperation aimed at innovation. Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) Working Paper.
DeVol, R., Koepp, R., & Fogelbach, F. (2002). State technology and science index: Comparing and contrasting California (Research Report). Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute.
Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2004). Regional innovation systems: A critical review.
Ernst D., Guerrieri, P., Iammarino, S., & Pietrobelli, C. (2001). New challenges for industrial clusters and districts: Global production networks and knowledge diffusion. In P. Guerrieri, S. Iammarino, & C. Pietrobelli (Eds.), The Global Challenge to Industrial Districts: SMEs in Italy and Taiwan (pp. 131-144). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The triple helix of university-industry-government relations: Implications for policy and evaluation. In P. Shapira, & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), Proceedings from the 2000 U.S.-European workshop on learning from science technology policy evaluation (pp. 11.1-11.20). September 2000, Bad Herrenalb, Germany. (21 June 2005)
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Networks of innovation: science, technology and development in the triple helix era. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 1, 7-20.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Learning from transition: The triple helix as innovation system. Paper presented to the Symposium on “Knowledge based society: A challenge for new EU and accession countries,” Zagreb, Croatia, 23 October.
Etzkowitz, H., & Brisolla, S. N. (1999). Failure and success: the fate of industrial policy in Latin America and South East Asia. Research Policy, 28, 337-350.
Eurostat. (2004). Innovation in Europe: Results for EU, Island and Norway. Luxemburg: European Commission.
Evans, R., & Marvin, S. (2004). Disciplining the sustainable city: Moving beyond science, technology or society. Paper presented at the Leverhulme International Symposium, 19-21 April, London School of Economics, (27 June 2005).
Falk, I., & Kilpatrick, S. (1999). Re-focusing on learning regions: Education, training and lifelong learning for Australia’s wellbeing. Plenary for Regional Australia Summit, Parliament House, 27–29 October, Canberra.
Langford, C. H., Hall, J., Josty, P., Matos, S., & Jacobson, A. (2005). Outcomes of university research in Canada: Innovation policy and indicators in triple helix relationships. Paper presented at the 5th Triple Helix Conference, 18-21 May, Turin, Italy.
Larson, E. V., & Brahmakulam, I. (2002). Innovation: From the creation of knowledge to national well-being. In E. V. Larson, & I Brahmakulam, Building a New Foundation for Innovation: Results of a Workshop for the National Science Foundation (pp. 13-24) (Monograph MR-1534). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Lécuyer, C. (2001). Technology and entrepreneurship in Silicon Valley. (2 March 2006).
LeGris, J., Weir, R., Browne, G., Gafni, A., Stewart, L., Easton, S. (1999). Developing a model of collaborative research: The complexities and challenges of implementation. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 37, 65-79.
Lesser and Storck. (2001).
Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the triple helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58, 445-467.
Leydesdorff, L. (2005). The triple helix model and the study of knowledge-based innovation systems. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 42, 1-16.
Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5, (2 August 2003).
Leydesdorff, L., Fritsch, M. (2005). Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany. Paper presented at the Fifth International Triple Helix Conference, 18-21 May Turin, Italy.
Lissenburgh, S., Harding, R. (2000). Knowledge links: Innovation in business academia relations. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Metzger, N., Zare, R. N. (1999). Interdisciplinary research: From belief to reality. Science, 29, 642-643.
Meyer, S. (2004). The Collective Team Competencies Questionnaire™ (CTCQ). (18 November 2004).
Moss, M. (1986). Urban growth, information technologies and the Pacific Rim. Pacific
Murchú, D. Ó., & Sorensen, E. (2004). Online master communities of practice: Collaborative learning in an intercultural perspective. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning, (14 March 2006).
Neus, A. (2001). Managing information quality in virtual communities of practice. In E. Pierce, & R. Katz-Haas (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Quality at MIT. Boston, MA: Sloan School of Management.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press.
Paarlberg, R. L. (2004). Science, military dominance, and U.S. security. International Security, 29, 122-151.
Pickles, T. (2003). Practice guide: Techniques for engaging with members. Sift Best Practice Programme. Bristol, England: Sift.
Pietrobelli, C. (2002). Italian and Taiwanese industrial districts and technological regimes. Science, Technology & Innovation Viewpoints. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development at Harvard University.
Poon, J. & MacPherson, A. (2003). Technology acquisition among Asian firms and technology clusters in the United States. ERSA Conference Paper No. ersa03p203. Vienna, Austria: European Regional Science Association.
Preese, J. (1999). Empathic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 63-77.
Preese, J. (2004). Etiquette, empathy and trust in communities of practice: Stepping-stones to social capital. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10, 294-302.
Robertson, D. W., Martin, D. K., Singer, P. A. (2003). Interdisciplinary research: Putting the methods under the microscope. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3, 20.
Sajeva, M., Garelli, D., Tarantola, S., & Hollanders, H. (May 2005). Methodology report in European Innovation Scoreboard 2005. European Commission Enterprise Directorate-General.
Sanz-Menendez, L.; Bordons, M. & Zulueta, M. A. (2001). Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: Its measure in three different research areas. Research Evaluation, 10, 47-58.
Saxenian, A., Hsu, J. Y. (2001). The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: Technical communities and industrial upgrading. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 893-920.
Shapira, P. (2002). Innovation challenges and strategies in catch-up regions: Developmental growth and disparities in Georgia, USA. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Rethinking Regional Innovation and Change: Path Dependency or Regional Breakthrough, Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung, Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart, 1 March, Germany.
Shaw, J. K. (1997). The emerging business economic of telecommunications. New Telecom Quarterly, 2Q97, 1-20.
Sherman, R., Miyataki, G. K. (2004). Report to the John A. Burns School of Medicine Regents’ Task Force, (9 June 2005).
Snyder, W. M., & de Souza Briggs, X. (2003). Communities of Practice: A new tool for 82. managers. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
Sobel, J. (2002). Can we trust social capital? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 139-154.
Stam, C. (2003). Building communities of practice questionnaire. Intellectual Capital Services: Holland. (18 November 2004).
Sutz, J. (1998). A triple helix of university, industry, government relations: The new location of research? A Commented Report of the Triple Helix II Conference, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Teigland, R., & Wasko, M. M. (2004). Extending richness with reach: Participation and knowledge exchange in electronic networks of practice. In P. M. Hildreth, & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice (pp. 230-242). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Treloar, C., Graham, I. D. (2003). Multidisciplinary cross-national studies: A commentary on issues of collaboration, methodology, analysis, and publication. Qualitative Health Research 13, 924-932.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: The social fabric of a learning organization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2001). Supporting communities of practice: A survey of community-oriented technologies. Report to the Council of CIOs of the US Federal Government.
Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, January, 139-145.
Wessner, C. W. (Ed.). (2002). Government-industry partnerships for development of new technologies. National Research Council, Board on Science, Technology and Economic Policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Wong, C. (1998). An analysis of collaborative research opportunities for the 95. Army (MR-675-A). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
The World Bank. (3 February 2006).
Young, A., De Souza, R., Datar, R., & Tramacere, G. (June 2005). IT management services forecast will show steady growth through 2009. Gartner Research Report (ID No. G0012921). San Jose, CA: Gartner.
Zeleznik, J., Agard-Henriques, B., Schnebel, B. (2003). Terminology used by different health care providers to document skin ulcers: The blind men and the elephant. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing 30, 324-333.
|
|
